Trigger.dev vs ufo-core
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Trigger.dev is growing faster: +195 GitHub stars a month on average vs +0 for ufo-core.
- Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows. Pick ufo-core for: agent operating system.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
u
ufo-coreopen-source
Agent operating system
Metrics
| Trigger.dev | ufo-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16.5k | 92 |
| Star velocity /mo | 195 | — |
| Commits (90d) | 732 | 27 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 3.0M | — |
| Overall score | 0.7561330909128069 | 0.5054335807225804 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Trigger.dev or ufo-core?
- Trigger.dev has more GitHub stars (16,484 vs 92).
- Which is more actively developed, Trigger.dev or ufo-core?
- Trigger.dev had more commits in the last 90 days (732 vs 27).
- Should I use Trigger.dev or ufo-core?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.