codebase-memory-mcp vs LogNorm
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- codebase-memory-mcp is growing faster: +1,680 GitHub stars a month on average vs +0 for LogNorm.
- codebase-memory-mcp is open-source; LogNorm is freemium.
- Pick codebase-memory-mcp for: mCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP. Pick LogNorm for: hand your growth backlog to agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
codebase-memory-mcpopen-source
MCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP
L
LogNormfreemium
Hand your growth backlog to agents
Metrics
| codebase-memory-mcp | LogNorm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 45.8k | — |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.7k | — |
| Commits (90d) | 2.0k | — |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | — |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 70.9K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8914838930998823 | 0 |
FAQ
- Should I use codebase-memory-mcp or LogNorm?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.