Orca vs screenshot-to-code

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Orca is growing faster: +18,590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,240 for screenshot-to-code.
  • Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Pick screenshot-to-code for: drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue).

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

O
Orcaopen-source

Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.

Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)

Metrics

Orcascreenshot-to-code
Stars84.1k79.9k
Star velocity /mo18.6k1.2k
Commits (90d)6.6k58
Releases (6m)100
Overall score0.9538456322566530.5382483256328683

Pros

    • +Multi-framework support with clean output in HTML/Tailwind, React, Vue, Bootstrap, and SVG formats
    • +Integration with leading AI models (Gemini 3, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5) ensuring high-quality code generation
    • +Experimental video-to-code feature enables conversion of screen recordings into functional prototypes

    Cons

      • -Requires API keys from paid AI services (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google), adding ongoing operational costs
      • -Quality heavily dependent on AI model performance, with open-source alternatives like Ollama producing poor results
      • -Limited to visual conversion - cannot understand complex business logic or backend functionality

      Use Cases

        • •Rapid prototyping where designers can quickly convert mockups into working code for client demos
        • •Design system implementation to transform Figma components into consistent React/Vue component libraries
        • •Legacy interface modernization by screenshotting old UIs and converting them to modern framework code
        View Orca DetailsView screenshot-to-code Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, Orca or screenshot-to-code?
        Orca has more GitHub stars (84,122 vs 79,946).
        Which is more actively developed, Orca or screenshot-to-code?
        Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,597 vs 58).
        Should I use Orca or screenshot-to-code?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.