OpenSandbox vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenSandbox is growing faster: +450 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +150 for Trigger.dev.
- Pick OpenSandbox for: secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents. Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenSandboxopen-source
Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Metrics
| OpenSandbox | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15.6k | 16.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 450 | 150 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.5k | 711 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.843169132549324 | 0.7556547595846174 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenSandbox or Trigger.dev?
- Trigger.dev has more GitHub stars (16,455 vs 15,647).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenSandbox or Trigger.dev?
- OpenSandbox had more commits in the last 90 days (1,543 vs 711).
- Should I use OpenSandbox or Trigger.dev?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.