openinterpreter vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
o
openinterpreteropen-source
A coding agent for open models like Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| openinterpreter | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 68.5k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 5.7k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.7k | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9331007206678938 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, openinterpreter or planning-with-files?
- openinterpreter has more GitHub stars (68,477 vs 27,205).
- Which is more actively developed, openinterpreter or planning-with-files?
- openinterpreter had more commits in the last 90 days (2,740 vs 237).
- Should I use openinterpreter or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.