OpenHuman vs workgpt

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • workgpt has had no commit in 39 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,774 commits in the last 90 days).
  • OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-0 for workgpt.
  • Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Pick workgpt for: a GPT agent framework for invoking APIs.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

O
OpenHumanopen-source

OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust

workgptopen-source

A GPT agent framework for invoking APIs

Metrics

OpenHumanworkgpt
Stars40.5k731
Star velocity /mo2.5k-0.4736842105263158
Commits (90d)22.8k0
Releases (6m)100
Overall score0.93082273956958560.12103254904665364

Pros

    • +支持任何OpenAPI格式的API，具有出色的扩展性和兼容性
    • +智能身份验证处理，自动识别和配置API认证方式
    • +集成OpenPM包管理器，简化API发现和集成流程

    Cons

      • -依赖OpenAI API调用，产生持续的使用成本
      • -主要基于文本交互，对于需要复杂UI操作的场景支持有限
      • -执行效果高度依赖外部API的可用性和响应质量

      Use Cases

        • •自动化网络研究和数据收集，如基于IP地址查询地理信息和人口统计
        • •网站内容爬取和结构化数据提取，利用Puppeteer进行智能网页解析
        • •多API协作的业务流程自动化，如集成多个服务完成复杂任务链
        View OpenHuman DetailsView workgpt Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, OpenHuman or workgpt?
        OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 731).
        Which is more actively developed, OpenHuman or workgpt?
        OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 0).
        Should I use OpenHuman or workgpt?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.