OpenAgents vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenAgents has had no commit in 22 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,774 commits in the last 90 days).
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +20 for OpenAgents.
- Pick OpenAgents for: cOLM 2024 OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the Wild. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
OpenAgentsopen-source
[COLM 2024] OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the Wild
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| OpenAgents | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4.9k | 40.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 20.210526315789473 | 2.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 22.8k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.20823696151351587 | 0.9308227395695856 |
Pros
- +集成三大核心代理功能,覆盖数据分析、工具调用和网络浏览等主要使用场景
- +完全开源架构支持本地部署,用户可自主控制数据和定制功能
- +提供 200+ 日常工具集成,极大扩展了代理的实用性和适用范围
Cons
- -作为学术研究项目,可能在商业化支持和长期维护方面存在不确定性
- -相比商业产品可能在用户界面优化和使用体验方面仍有改进空间
Use Cases
- •数据分析师使用数据代理进行复杂数据处理和可视化分析
- •普通用户通过插件代理调用各种日常工具完成生活和工作任务
- •研究人员利用网络代理自动化网页浏览和信息收集工作
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 4,863).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 0).
- Should I use OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.