OmO vs screenshot-to-code

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • screenshot-to-code is growing faster: +1,240 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +810 for OmO.
  • Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Pick screenshot-to-code for: drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue).

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

O
OmOopen-source

OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.

Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)

Metrics

OmOscreenshot-to-code
Stars69.8k79.9k
Star velocity /mo8101.2k
Commits (90d)9.7k58
Releases (6m)100
Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI)91.7K—
Overall score0.89735478317189890.5382483256328683

Pros

    • +Multi-framework support with clean output in HTML/Tailwind, React, Vue, Bootstrap, and SVG formats
    • +Integration with leading AI models (Gemini 3, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5) ensuring high-quality code generation
    • +Experimental video-to-code feature enables conversion of screen recordings into functional prototypes

    Cons

      • -Requires API keys from paid AI services (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google), adding ongoing operational costs
      • -Quality heavily dependent on AI model performance, with open-source alternatives like Ollama producing poor results
      • -Limited to visual conversion - cannot understand complex business logic or backend functionality

      Use Cases

        • •Rapid prototyping where designers can quickly convert mockups into working code for client demos
        • •Design system implementation to transform Figma components into consistent React/Vue component libraries
        • •Legacy interface modernization by screenshotting old UIs and converting them to modern framework code
        View OmO DetailsView screenshot-to-code Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, OmO or screenshot-to-code?
        screenshot-to-code has more GitHub stars (79,946 vs 69,768).
        Which is more actively developed, OmO or screenshot-to-code?
        OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 58).
        Should I use OmO or screenshot-to-code?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.