oh-my-claudecode vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +810 for oh-my-claudecode.
- Pick oh-my-claudecode for: teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
o
oh-my-claudecodeopen-source
Teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| oh-my-claudecode | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39.5k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 810 | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 1.6k | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8804499063456995 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, oh-my-claudecode or omp?
- oh-my-claudecode has more GitHub stars (39,534 vs 34,075).
- Which is more actively developed, oh-my-claudecode or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 1,626).
- Should I use oh-my-claudecode or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.