MemOS vs OpenViking
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
M
MemOSopen-source
Self-evolving memory OS for LLM & AI Agents: ultra-persistent memory, hybrid-retrieval, and cross-task skill reuse, with 35.24% token savings and DeepSeek Harne
O
OpenVikingopen-source
Self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Unify Agent Memory, Knowledge RAG and Skills.
Metrics
| MemOS | OpenViking | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.7k | 39.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 971.6666666666666 | 3.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 264 | 1.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.730926100634913 | 0.887431076360378 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, MemOS or OpenViking?
- OpenViking has more GitHub stars (39,054 vs 11,660).
- Which is more actively developed, MemOS or OpenViking?
- OpenViking had more commits in the last 90 days (1,028 vs 264).
- Should I use MemOS or OpenViking?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.