Which is more popular, invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?

invisible_playwright_mcp has more GitHub stars (31,727 vs 23,108).

Which is more actively developed, invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?

Skyvern had more commits in the last 90 days (1,319 vs 290).

Should I use invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

invisible_playwright_mcp vs Skyvern

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

invisible_playwright_mcpopen-source

Playwright MCP server undetected by anti-bots and captchas: AI agent browses the web on anti-detect stealth Firefox, Python, undetected browser automation, scra

Skyvernfree

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Metrics

	invisible_playwright_mcp	Skyvern
Stars	31.7k	23.1k
Star velocity /mo	2.6k	342.3529411764706
Commits (90d)	290	1.3k
Releases (6m)	10	10
Overall score	0.8197249292916216	0.7684305540550709

Pros

+基于视觉 LLMs 的智能识别，能适应网站布局变化，相比传统 XPath 方案更稳定可靠
+提供无代码工作流构建器，降低技术门槛，让非技术用户也能创建复杂的自动化流程
+与 Playwright 兼容的 SDK 设计，为开发者提供熟悉的接口和强大的 AI 增强功能

Cons

-依赖大语言模型可能导致响应延迟和不可预测性，执行速度相比传统脚本较慢
-AI 模型的推理成本可能增加长期运维费用，特别是大规模自动化场景
-对复杂网站或特殊交互场景的处理能力仍需验证，可能存在理解偏差

Use Cases

•电商网站数据采集和价格监控，自动适应不同网站的页面结构变化
•表单批量填写和提交，如保险申请、求职申请等重复性业务流程自动化
•网站功能测试和监控，自动验证关键业务流程的可用性和性能表现

View invisible_playwright_mcp Details View Skyvern Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?: invisible_playwright_mcp has more GitHub stars (31,727 vs 23,108).
Which is more actively developed, invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?: Skyvern had more commits in the last 90 days (1,319 vs 290).
Should I use invisible_playwright_mcp or Skyvern?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.