invisible_playwright_mcp vs mcp-use
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
i
invisible_playwright_mcpopen-source
Playwright MCP server undetected by anti-bots and captchas: AI agent browses the web on anti-detect stealth Firefox, Python, undetected browser automation, scra
m
mcp-useopen-source
The fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
Metrics
| invisible_playwright_mcp | mcp-use | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.7k | 10.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.6k | 892 |
| Commits (90d) | 290 | 668 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8197249292916216 | 0.7773819983515451 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, invisible_playwright_mcp or mcp-use?
- invisible_playwright_mcp has more GitHub stars (31,727 vs 10,704).
- Which is more actively developed, invisible_playwright_mcp or mcp-use?
- mcp-use had more commits in the last 90 days (668 vs 290).
- Should I use invisible_playwright_mcp or mcp-use?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.