HyperFrames vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| HyperFrames | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 54.6k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 4.6k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.9k | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9300617150688252 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, HyperFrames or planning-with-files?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (54,633 vs 27,205).
- Which is more actively developed, HyperFrames or planning-with-files?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,867 vs 237).
- Should I use HyperFrames or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.