HyperFrames vs mcp-use
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,430 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +195 for mcp-use.
- Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML. Pick mcp-use for: the fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
m
mcp-useopen-source
The fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
Metrics
| HyperFrames | mcp-use | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 55.6k | 10.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 14.4k | 195 |
| Commits (90d) | 2.9k | 665 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9467131295947988 | 0.7614806982370892 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, HyperFrames or mcp-use?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (55,595 vs 10,717).
- Which is more actively developed, HyperFrames or mcp-use?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,927 vs 665).
- Should I use HyperFrames or mcp-use?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.