Graphiti vs headroom
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- headroom is growing faster: +1,380 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +740 for Graphiti.
- Pick Graphiti for: build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents. Pick headroom for: compresses tool outputs, logs, RAG chunks, files, and conversation history before they reach LLMs.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
G
Graphitiopen-source
Build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents
h
headroomopen-source
Compresses tool outputs, logs, RAG chunks, files, and conversation history before they reach LLMs
Metrics
| Graphiti | headroom | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.4k | 74.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 740 | 1.4k |
| Commits (90d) | 117 | 1.2k |
| Releases (6m) | 7 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 608.9K | 246.3K |
| Overall score | 0.7219871556209319 | 0.8788654416490241 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graphiti or headroom?
- headroom has more GitHub stars (74,314 vs 31,400).
- Which is more actively developed, Graphiti or headroom?
- headroom had more commits in the last 90 days (1,226 vs 117).
- Should I use Graphiti or headroom?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.