Graphify vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Graphify is growing faster: +6,540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +590 for planning-with-files.
- Graphify is freemium; planning-with-files is open-source.
- Pick Graphify for: local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph. Pick planning-with-files for: persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
G
Graphifyfreemium
Local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks
Metrics
| Graphify | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 123.4k | 27.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 6.5k | 590 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.1k | 228 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 2.7K |
| Overall score | 0.9044125608136018 | 0.7798501915116138 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graphify or planning-with-files?
- Graphify has more GitHub stars (123,420 vs 27,264).
- Which is more actively developed, Graphify or planning-with-files?
- Graphify had more commits in the last 90 days (1,056 vs 228).
- Should I use Graphify or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.