Graft vs Orca
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
O
Orcaopen-source
Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.
Metrics
| Graft | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.4k | 82.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 786.0833333333334 | 6.9k |
| Commits (90d) | 512 | 6.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6442866086474068 | 0.9501045155071188 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graft or Orca?
- Orca has more GitHub stars (82,263 vs 9,433).
- Which is more actively developed, Graft or Orca?
- Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,395 vs 512).
- Should I use Graft or Orca?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.