Graft vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,065 for Graft.
- Pick Graft for: turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Graft | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.5k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.1k | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 506 | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7281102466707609 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graft or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,075 vs 9,504).
- Which is more actively developed, Graft or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 506).
- Should I use Graft or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.