GPTeam vs OpenHuman

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • GPTeam has had no commit in 27 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,774 commits in the last 90 days).
  • OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1 for GPTeam.
  • Pick GPTeam for: gPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

GPTeamopen-source

GPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation

O
OpenHumanopen-source

OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust

Metrics

GPTeamOpenHuman
Stars1.7k40.5k
Star velocity /mo0.94736842105263162.5k
Commits (90d)022.8k
Releases (6m)010
Overall score0.153253833593561650.9308227395695856

Pros

  • +基于 GPT-4 的高质量智能体协作，支持复杂任务的分布式处理
  • +开源架构且社区活跃，提供完整的智能体记忆和反思机制实现
  • +支持实时监控和 Discord 集成，可观察智能体状态并与外部系统交互

    Cons

    • -依赖 OpenAI API，运行成本较高，尤其是使用 GPT-4 时
    • -主要绑定 OpenAI 生态，对其他 AI 提供商的支持有限
    • -Python 环境要求和配置相对复杂，需要一定的技术背景

      Use Cases

      • •多智能体系统的学术研究，探索智能体协作和通信模式
      • •复杂业务流程的 AI 自动化，通过多智能体分工协作处理任务
      • •AI 游戏和仿真开发，创建具有独立思考能力的虚拟角色
        View GPTeam DetailsView OpenHuman Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, GPTeam or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 1,723).
        Which is more actively developed, GPTeam or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 0).
        Should I use GPTeam or OpenHuman?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.