garak vs iFixAi
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- iFixAi is growing faster: +23,220 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +200 for garak.
- Pick garak for: the LLM vulnerability scanner. Pick iFixAi for: audits AI agents against business KPIs and organizational requirements with A–F scorecards.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
g
garakopen-source
the LLM vulnerability scanner
i
iFixAiopen-source
Audits AI agents against business KPIs and organizational requirements with A–F scorecards
Metrics
| garak | iFixAi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.4k | 19.6k |
| Star velocity /mo | 200 | 23.2k |
| Commits (90d) | 227 | 65 |
| Releases (6m) | 4 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 36.2K | 473 |
| Overall score | 0.6619474909300054 | 0.8203523828873769 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, garak or iFixAi?
- iFixAi has more GitHub stars (19,634 vs 9,414).
- Which is more actively developed, garak or iFixAi?
- garak had more commits in the last 90 days (227 vs 65).
- Should I use garak or iFixAi?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.