FunASR vs xiaozhi-esp32-server
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- FunASR is growing faster: +165 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for xiaozhi-esp32-server.
- Pick FunASR for: open-source speech recognition toolkit for offline, streaming, and edge ASR, VAD, punctuation, and diarization. Pick xiaozhi-esp32-server for: 本项目为xiaozhi-esp32提供后端服务，帮助您快速搭建ESP32设备控制服务器。Backend service for xiaozhi-esp32, helps you quickly build.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
FunASRopen-source
Open-source speech recognition toolkit for offline, streaming, and edge ASR, VAD, punctuation, and diarization
x
xiaozhi-esp32-serveropen-source
本项目为xiaozhi-esp32提供后端服务，帮助您快速搭建ESP32设备控制服务器。Backend service for xiaozhi-esp32, helps you quickly build an ESP32 device control server.
Metrics
| FunASR | xiaozhi-esp32-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20.6k | 10.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 165 | 75 |
| Commits (90d) | 774 | 165 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 5 |
| Overall score | 0.7622926564226364 | 0.6145586373117157 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, FunASR or xiaozhi-esp32-server?
- FunASR has more GitHub stars (20,570 vs 10,721).
- Which is more actively developed, FunASR or xiaozhi-esp32-server?
- FunASR had more commits in the last 90 days (774 vs 165).
- Should I use FunASR or xiaozhi-esp32-server?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.