Figma-Context-MCP vs serena
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- serena is growing faster: +380 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Figma-Context-MCP.
- Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor. Pick serena for: a powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
s
serenaopen-source
A powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE for your agent
Metrics
| Figma-Context-MCP | serena | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15.9k | 30.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 70 | 380 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 394 |
| Releases (6m) | 9 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 322.1K | 145.2K |
| Overall score | 0.3435886524064716 | 0.773024478061336 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Figma-Context-MCP or serena?
- serena has more GitHub stars (29,955 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, Figma-Context-MCP or serena?
- serena had more commits in the last 90 days (394 vs 0).
- Should I use Figma-Context-MCP or serena?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.