Figma-Context-MCP vs Playwright MCP server
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Playwright MCP server is growing faster: +590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Figma-Context-MCP.
- Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor. Pick Playwright MCP server for: playwright MCP server.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
P
Playwright MCP serveropen-source
Playwright MCP server
Metrics
| Figma-Context-MCP | Playwright MCP server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15.9k | 37.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 70 | 590 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 35 |
| Releases (6m) | 9 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 322.1K | 29.0M |
| Overall score | 0.3435886524064716 | 0.714300839719364 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Figma-Context-MCP or Playwright MCP server?
- Playwright MCP server has more GitHub stars (37,778 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, Figma-Context-MCP or Playwright MCP server?
- Playwright MCP server had more commits in the last 90 days (35 vs 0).
- Should I use Figma-Context-MCP or Playwright MCP server?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.