Figma-Context-MCP vs n8n-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Figma-Context-MCP is growing faster: +70 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +30 for n8n-MCP.
- Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor. Pick n8n-MCP for: a MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
n
n8n-MCPopen-source
A MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you
Metrics
| Figma-Context-MCP | n8n-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15.9k | 23.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 70 | 30 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 137 |
| Releases (6m) | 9 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 322.1K | 424.8K |
| Overall score | 0.3435886524064716 | 0.6117161512649488 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Figma-Context-MCP or n8n-MCP?
- n8n-MCP has more GitHub stars (23,032 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, Figma-Context-MCP or n8n-MCP?
- n8n-MCP had more commits in the last 90 days (137 vs 0).
- Should I use Figma-Context-MCP or n8n-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.