FastGPT vs Kestra
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Kestra is growing faster: +3,540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +10 for FastGPT.
- Pick FastGPT for: aI agent building platform with data processing, model invocation, visual workflows, and Docker deployment. Pick Kestra for: event Driven Orchestration & Scheduling Platform for Mission Critical Applications.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
FastGPTopen-source
AI agent building platform with data processing, model invocation, visual workflows, and Docker deployment
K
Kestraopen-source
Event Driven Orchestration & Scheduling Platform for Mission Critical Applications
Metrics
| FastGPT | Kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29.8k | 28.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 10 | 3.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 440 | 1.5k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.629137549507582 | 0.9089092692995532 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, FastGPT or Kestra?
- FastGPT has more GitHub stars (29,775 vs 28,908).
- Which is more actively developed, FastGPT or Kestra?
- Kestra had more commits in the last 90 days (1,491 vs 440).
- Should I use FastGPT or Kestra?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.