Daytona vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Trigger.dev is growing faster: +150 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +15 for Daytona.
- Pick Daytona for: daytona is a Secure and Elastic Infrastructure for Running AI-Generated Code. Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
D
Daytonaopen-source
Daytona is a Secure and Elastic Infrastructure for Running AI-Generated Code
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Metrics
| Daytona | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 71.7k | 16.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 15 | 150 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 711 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.3519103200564768 | 0.7556547595846174 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Daytona or Trigger.dev?
- Daytona has more GitHub stars (71,676 vs 16,455).
- Which is more actively developed, Daytona or Trigger.dev?
- Trigger.dev had more commits in the last 90 days (711 vs 0).
- Should I use Daytona or Trigger.dev?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.