Which is more popular, Cursor or omp?

omp has more GitHub stars (33,873 vs 33,256).

Which is more actively developed, Cursor or omp?

omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,784 vs 0).

Should I use Cursor or omp?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Cursor vs omp

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Cursorfree

The AI Code Editor

ompopen-source

⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.

Metrics

	Cursor	omp
Stars	33.3k	33.9k
Star velocity /mo	117.43315508021392	2.8k
Commits (90d)	0	13.8k
Releases (6m)	0	10
Overall score	0.2649113381693581	0.9181501744379592

Pros

+High community adoption with 32,000+ GitHub stars indicating strong developer interest
+Combines traditional code editing with AI coding agent capabilities in a single tool
+Active community support through dedicated forum for user feedback and feature requests

Cons

-Limited public documentation available about specific features and capabilities
-Requires download and installation rather than being browser-based for immediate access

Use Cases

•Developers looking to integrate AI assistance directly into their code editing workflow
•Teams wanting to combine traditional IDE functionality with modern AI coding capabilities
•Programmers seeking an AI-enhanced alternative to conventional code editors

View Cursor Details View omp Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, Cursor or omp?: omp has more GitHub stars (33,873 vs 33,256).
Which is more actively developed, Cursor or omp?: omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,784 vs 0).
Should I use Cursor or omp?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.