Which is more popular, Cua or NanoClaw?

NanoClaw has more GitHub stars (30,868 vs 27,747).

Which is more actively developed, Cua or NanoClaw?

Cua had more commits in the last 90 days (1,409 vs 947).

Should I use Cua or NanoClaw?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Cua vs NanoClaw

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

Cua is growing faster: +2,970 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for NanoClaw.
Pick Cua for: scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation. Pick NanoClaw for: aI assistant running agents in Linux containers with messaging, memory, and scheduled jobs.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Cuaopen-source

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

NanoClawopen-source

AI assistant running agents in Linux containers with messaging, memory, and scheduled jobs

Metrics

	Cua	NanoClaw
Stars	27.7k	30.9k
Star velocity /mo	3.0k	60
Commits (90d)	1.4k	947
Releases (6m)	10	8
Overall score	0.9092592394174208	0.6822044917162984

View Cua Details View NanoClaw Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, Cua or NanoClaw?: NanoClaw has more GitHub stars (30,868 vs 27,747).
Which is more actively developed, Cua or NanoClaw?: Cua had more commits in the last 90 days (1,409 vs 947).
Should I use Cua or NanoClaw?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.