Context Mode vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
C
Context Modeopen-source
Context window optimization for AI coding agents. Sandboxes tool output (98% reduction), persists session memory, and enforces routing across 17 platforms via
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| Context Mode | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24.4k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.0k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 141 | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7883099637043637 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Context Mode or planning-with-files?
- planning-with-files has more GitHub stars (27,205 vs 24,422).
- Which is more actively developed, Context Mode or planning-with-files?
- planning-with-files had more commits in the last 90 days (237 vs 141).
- Should I use Context Mode or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.