Codewhale vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
C
Codewhaleopen-source
Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| Codewhale | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 41.0k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 3.4k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 7.6k | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9290667788661088 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Codewhale or planning-with-files?
- Codewhale has more GitHub stars (41,044 vs 27,205).
- Which is more actively developed, Codewhale or planning-with-files?
- Codewhale had more commits in the last 90 days (7,632 vs 237).
- Should I use Codewhale or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.