codebase-memory-mcp vs Graft
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
codebase-memory-mcpopen-source
High-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 158 languages, sub-ms queries
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
Metrics
| codebase-memory-mcp | Graft | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 45.6k | 9.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 3.8k | 786.0833333333334 |
| Commits (90d) | 2.1k | 512 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Overall score | 0.912298123773986 | 0.6442866086474068 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, codebase-memory-mcp or Graft?
- codebase-memory-mcp has more GitHub stars (45,551 vs 9,433).
- Which is more actively developed, codebase-memory-mcp or Graft?
- codebase-memory-mcp had more commits in the last 90 days (2,093 vs 512).
- Should I use codebase-memory-mcp or Graft?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.