code-review-graph vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local-first code intelligence graph for MCP and CLI. Builds a persistent map of your codebase so AI coding tools read only what matters, with benchmarked contex
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| code-review-graph | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.9k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.7k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 666 | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8261590658155253 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,876 vs 27,205).
- Which is more actively developed, code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (666 vs 237).
- Should I use code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.