code-review-graph vs Graft
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local-first code intelligence graph for MCP and CLI. Builds a persistent map of your codebase so AI coding tools read only what matters, with benchmarked contex
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
Metrics
| code-review-graph | Graft | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.9k | 9.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.7k | 786.0833333333334 |
| Commits (90d) | 666 | 512 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Overall score | 0.8261590658155253 | 0.6442866086474068 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, code-review-graph or Graft?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,876 vs 9,433).
- Which is more actively developed, code-review-graph or Graft?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (666 vs 512).
- Should I use code-review-graph or Graft?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.