code-review-graph vs Figma-Context-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- code-review-graph is growing faster: +220 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Figma-Context-MCP.
- Pick code-review-graph for: local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP. Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
Metrics
| code-review-graph | Figma-Context-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.9k | 15.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 220 | 70 |
| Commits (90d) | 665 | 0 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 9 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 297.0K | 322.1K |
| Overall score | 0.7208179595910345 | 0.3435886524064716 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, code-review-graph or Figma-Context-MCP?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,898 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, code-review-graph or Figma-Context-MCP?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (665 vs 0).
- Should I use code-review-graph or Figma-Context-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.