Claude Code Plugins Directory vs HyperFrames
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,710 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +880 for Claude Code Plugins Directory.
- Pick Claude Code Plugins Directory for: official, Anthropic-managed directory of high quality Claude Code Plugins. Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
Official, Anthropic-managed directory of high quality Claude Code Plugins.
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
Metrics
| Claude Code Plugins Directory | HyperFrames | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37.3k | 56.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 880 | 14.7k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.5k | 3.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 1.7M |
| Overall score | 0.7655779313489288 | 0.94184515668165 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude Code Plugins Directory or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (56,104 vs 37,330).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude Code Plugins Directory or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,970 vs 2,507).
- Should I use Claude Code Plugins Directory or HyperFrames?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.