claude-context vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn r
Metrics
| claude-context | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 27.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.0k | 2.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 237 |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.42507297154939094 | 0.8039568963116691 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or planning-with-files?
- planning-with-files has more GitHub stars (27,205 vs 12,580).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or planning-with-files?
- planning-with-files had more commits in the last 90 days (237 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.