Chrome DevTools for agents vs Figma-Context-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Chrome DevTools for agents is growing faster: +930 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Figma-Context-MCP.
- Pick Chrome DevTools for agents for: chrome DevTools for coding agents. Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Chrome DevTools for agentsopen-source
Chrome DevTools for coding agents
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
Metrics
| Chrome DevTools for agents | Figma-Context-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 52.9k | 15.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 930 | 70 |
| Commits (90d) | 350 | 0 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 9 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 7.9M | 322.1K |
| Overall score | 0.8216627288549094 | 0.3435886524064716 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Chrome DevTools for agents or Figma-Context-MCP?
- Chrome DevTools for agents has more GitHub stars (52,903 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, Chrome DevTools for agents or Figma-Context-MCP?
- Chrome DevTools for agents had more commits in the last 90 days (350 vs 0).
- Should I use Chrome DevTools for agents or Figma-Context-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.