cc-haha vs OmO
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Local-first cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code / agents: multi-agent, Git worktrees, code diffs, skill marketplace, multi-model, Computer Use, tas
O
OmOopen-source
OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.
Metrics
| cc-haha | OmO | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 69.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.2k | 5.8k |
| Commits (90d) | 886 | 9.1k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8098229207614953 | 0.9467088818808445 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or OmO?
- OmO has more GitHub stars (69,687 vs 14,793).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or OmO?
- OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,058 vs 886).
- Should I use cc-haha or OmO?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.