career-ops vs Graft
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
c
career-opsopen-source
Open-source AI job search agent: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a global 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications —
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
Metrics
| career-ops | Graft | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 73.1k | 9.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 6.1k | 786.0833333333334 |
| Commits (90d) | 2.0k | 512 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Overall score | 0.9279277574775668 | 0.6442866086474068 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, career-ops or Graft?
- career-ops has more GitHub stars (73,142 vs 9,433).
- Which is more actively developed, career-ops or Graft?
- career-ops had more commits in the last 90 days (1,973 vs 512).
- Should I use career-ops or Graft?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.