camofox-browser vs Page Agent
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- camofox-browser is growing faster: +1,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +280 for Page Agent.
- Pick camofox-browser for: stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Pick Page Agent for: javaScript in-page GUI agent.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
camofox-browseropen-source
Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.
P
Page Agentopen-source
JavaScript in-page GUI agent. Control web interfaces with natural language.
Metrics
| camofox-browser | Page Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.4k | 29.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.0k | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 182 | 52 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 125.2K | 62.5K |
| Overall score | 0.7988418544264082 | 0.6258565287825282 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, camofox-browser or Page Agent?
- Page Agent has more GitHub stars (29,316 vs 11,388).
- Which is more actively developed, camofox-browser or Page Agent?
- camofox-browser had more commits in the last 90 days (182 vs 52).
- Should I use camofox-browser or Page Agent?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.