camofox-browser vs Feynman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- camofox-browser is growing faster: +1,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +140 for Feynman.
- Pick camofox-browser for: stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Pick Feynman for: the open source AI research agent.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
camofox-browseropen-source
Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.
F
Feynmanopen-source
The open source AI research agent.
Metrics
| camofox-browser | Feynman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.4k | 9.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.0k | 140 |
| Commits (90d) | 182 | 493 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 125.2K | 142.6K |
| Overall score | 0.7988418544264082 | 0.726140081301661 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, camofox-browser or Feynman?
- camofox-browser has more GitHub stars (11,388 vs 9,865).
- Which is more actively developed, camofox-browser or Feynman?
- Feynman had more commits in the last 90 days (493 vs 182).
- Should I use camofox-browser or Feynman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.