AutoAct vs OpenHuman

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • AutoAct has had no commit in 20 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,774 commits in the last 90 days).
  • OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +0 for AutoAct.
  • Pick AutoAct for: aCL 2024 AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planning. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

AutoActopen-source

[ACL 2024] AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planning

O
OpenHumanopen-source

OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust

Metrics

AutoActOpenHuman
Stars23940.5k
Star velocity /mo0.47368421052631582.5k
Commits (90d)022.8k
Releases (6m)010
Overall score0.14409005672328220.9308227395695856

Pros

  • +Eliminates dependency on expensive closed-source models like GPT-4, making agent development more accessible and cost-effective
  • +Automatically synthesizes planning trajectories without requiring human annotation or manual trajectory creation
  • +Implements division-of-labor strategy with specialized sub-agents for improved task decomposition and completion

    Cons

    • -Primarily focused on question answering tasks, which may limit applicability to other agent use cases
    • -Requires an existing tool library to function effectively, adding setup complexity
    • -Performance may vary significantly depending on the quality and capabilities of the underlying open-source language model used

      Use Cases

      • •Building cost-effective QA agents for organizations without access to expensive closed-source language models
      • •Creating reproducible agent systems in research environments with limited annotated training data
      • •Developing multi-agent systems that require automatic task decomposition and specialized sub-agent coordination
        View AutoAct DetailsView OpenHuman Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, AutoAct or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 239).
        Which is more actively developed, AutoAct or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 0).
        Should I use AutoAct or OpenHuman?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.