Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep vs Orca
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Orca is growing faster: +18,590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +640 for Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.
- Pick Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep for: markdown skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review, idea discovery, experiment automation. Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepopen-source
Markdown skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review, idea discovery, experiment automation
O
Orcaopen-source
Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.
Metrics
| Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16.9k | 84.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 640 | 18.6k |
| Commits (90d) | 190 | 6.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7670091901892325 | 0.953845632256653 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or Orca?
- Orca has more GitHub stars (84,122 vs 16,921).
- Which is more actively developed, Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or Orca?
- Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,597 vs 190).
- Should I use Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or Orca?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.