Activepieces vs LobeHub
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Activepieces is growing faster: +550 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +310 for LobeHub.
- Pick Activepieces for: open-source AI automation platform with TypeScript pieces available as MCP servers. Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Activepiecesopen-source
Open-source AI automation platform with TypeScript pieces available as MCP servers
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
Metrics
| Activepieces | LobeHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24.9k | 83.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 550 | 310 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.0k | 2.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8282648372470303 | 0.8263760210963236 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Activepieces or LobeHub?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 24,871).
- Which is more actively developed, Activepieces or LobeHub?
- LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 1,048).
- Should I use Activepieces or LobeHub?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.